Options Proposed for the Waste Management Program at the Navistar Plant - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1085 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2018/12/30 Category Business Essay Type Case study Level High school Did you like this example? Introduction Navistar International Corporation carried out a thorough review about the outcomes of the plant-wide waste audit during August 1994. The companys then co-coordinators proposed that necessary steps should be taken to completely address the issue. The coordinator believed that a solid waste management strategy should be adopted to ensure the sustenance of the company. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Options Proposed for the Waste Management Program at the Navistar Plant" essay for you Create order During 1994, Navistar was the leading producer company known in selling both medium and heavy trucks in the entire North American market for 14 successive years. At that time, the corporation only operated eight manufacturing plants as well as 2 technical centers, with a total number of employees of 14, 900 individuals globally. During that year, the company generated $5.3 billion in revenues. Background Navistars premium conventional and serious service trucks were manufactured at the Chatham manufacturing plant, whereas the companys regular usual and cabover trucks were manufactured and assembled at Navistars assembly center located in Springfield. Regardless, the company presented its first environmental, health and safety report for the financial year of 1994. The report, however, outlined that company-wide events, especially in environmental, health and safety sectors as well as the planned program for future environmental, health and safety events for the corporation. The report also included Navistars Environmental Protection Policy which should guide the companys options regarding proposed options for the waste management program. Because of that, Navistar sustained a competent environmental staff with an aim of monitoring and implementing various environmental outlines and to offer training to the companys workers. More so, the companys environmental staff advised the companys vice-president, who then reported to the companys quality management and technology department, who then report to both the president and CEO. To add, the board of directors which had sanctioned the Environmental Protection Policy and Management Program was frequently informed regarding the companys environmental routine. In October 1994, the company officialized a number of its Environmental Executive Committee. The committee was accountable for overseeing and assessing the companys observance with environmental needs, assure the world that the companys environmental thoughts are an integral part of Navistars business programs. Furthermore, the committee was responsible for assuring involved stakeholders that there are enough resources that can support the companys Environmental Management Program. The committee also reviewed all environmental revelations in their yearly 10-K as well as other shareholder statements as needed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, creating and communicating business status on important environmental outlines, problems, legislation and involvement in voluntary environmental outlines funded by various government institutions. Navistars Waste Management Program The company included various environmental processes in their Environmental Management Program. These procedures were developed with an aim of implementing them at all company sites. Therefore, Navistars environmental Protection Policy alongside its Environmental Management Program as well as corporate processes were intended to guarantee the implementation of company-wide environmental programs. Additionally, these programs were implemented in technically achievable and cost-effective ways, and complied with applicable governmental guidelines. To begin with, the company institutionalized its pollution deterrence events according to the GREEN Program. The main objective of this option was to minimize the companys environmental emissions. In this scheme, the companys executive environmental, health and safety directors were explicitly accountable for creating general objectives for waste and emissions minimizations. Each and every facility or plant, nevertheless, was offered with independency to create and highlight specific methods for attaining the programsobjectives. For instance, in the companys 1994 environmental health and safety statement, Navistars management were compelled to design pollution avoidance objectives for 1996. One such goal was to include a 20% decline in the material and waste disposal expenditures. Also, a broad range of plans was in progress, targeting pollution avoidance and decline, and recycling and treatment. In other words, the company had adopted recycling strategies for cardboard, packaging ma terials and wood pallets to name a few. Creating a Sturdy Waste Management Program The company should have substantial prospects for recycling. This means that a plant-wide recycling strategy can be the best pathway to meet the companys waste minimization objectives. However, setting up a budget and recognizing the needed resources for the program is decisive. The prevailing configurations for the companys cardboard or even scraps, for instance, were income-neutral. Therefore, a further waste management program should comprise of extra commitment to recycling to ensure that the current configuration does not get discontinued. Also, the company can include two options in their recycling program. To begin with, the company can contract with a third party waste management corporation to deal with plant waste at a central location. Under this alternative, solid waste gathering in any plant can continue unaffected, even though after its been collected, the solid waste would be shipped for cataloging and processing purposes. Though, sorting can make the company shoulder unnecessary expenses since it is a labor intensive procedure in sorting, managing and shipping recyclable products. The company can also install recycling centers all through the manufacturing plant. Additionally, each center would comprise of numerous containers, even though the total number of containers needed relies of the diversity of the materials recycled, with each container branded to contain particular waste including glass and paper. Though, this suggestion does not clearly outline how many stations will be needed to hold recycled materials. In this alternative, the isolated solid waste would be taken to a processing center situated in the plant where materials to be recycled would consequently be retailed or gotten rid of by other recycling firms. Lastly, for Navistar to efficiently handle their Waste Management programs, they all must have corporate and plant management support. In a nutshell, corporate management ensures that accountable individuals comply with corporate principles and processes, including the team achieving a 20% waste minimization included in their GREEN program. Therefore, efficient plant organization would be closely apprehensive about plant operations as well as profitability. However, the company must first comply with the 3R Regulations which will aid towards the success of waste audit and waste minimization strategy. Conclusion To sum up, it is evident that Navistar Corporation is obligated to following high standards of environmental superiority in addition to offering a workplace that safeguards both the health and safety of their employees as well as the communities neighboring the companys facilities. Therefore, for the company to manage these obligations, in a technically sane and cost-effective way, it must carry out all its operations in observance with pertinent environmental laws and guidelines. The company must also design, create and operate its facilities in a way that safeguards the health and safety of their workers, people in surrounding societies, and even the environment itself among employing other strategies.

Essay about The NSA, Privacy and the War or Terrorism

Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as†¦show more content†¦However, when the terrorists attacked in 2001, Bush immediately passed the Patriot Act in response. In section 215 of the Patriot Act, it allows the government to collect information regarding terrorist th reats. Basically, the outcome of the Act resulted in easier access to information about any individual. Then in 2005, people of foreign countries began to find out that the government was listening to them, so Congress passed the FISA amendments of 2007, stating that the U.S. government would only interfere with communication if it felt it was a direct threat to the United States. Laws governing surveillance were originally issued by the government to protect the country from terrorists. Yet, critics argue that the NSA program has not helped prevent any terrorist attacks (Elliott). On the contrary, statistics from propublic.org show that fifty-four failed terrorist attacks were identified by the NSA surveillance program. Of that fifty-four, thirteen of them were in the United States (Eliott). Since 9/11, a total of fifty terrorist attacks on U.S. have been thwarted (Carafano). By those numbers, twenty-five percent of terrorists attacks targeted toward the U.S. were foiled because of the NSA. According to heritage.org, between 2001 and 2009, a total of 471 terrorist attacks were against the United States (Carafano). The statistics show that the government needs more help in identifying terrorists. In addition, the government has said that theShow MoreRelatedThe Importance of the Telephone for Communicating1668 Words   |  7 PagesIn short public phones are no t such a nuisance, but private phones often tend to become a nuisance. Thats the big problem in having a telephone because sometimes they are invading our privacy especially those private telephones. This case study talks and explain the invading of some telephone company in the privacy of their client. IMPORTANCE OF TELEPHONE The use of the telephone is very important to all the people now a days, especially to the company. Telephones make the distance reduced theRead MoreThe Night - Original Writing1601 Words   |  7 Pagessafety of others, they lost their lives fighting terrorism, why can’t we lose a little bit of our privacy, so it doesn’t happen again. The NSA should be able to keep, watching terrorist and those in connect with them actions. After this horrible event, it came to light that multiple different organization in the government had information on this attack, but they did not put the information together. Hundreds dead in this horrible act of terrorism, this horrible act that lives in thousands of memoriesRead MoreInvisible M Ethics And A World Without Secrets1663 Words   |  7 Pagesquite that simple. If we are to abandon our rights for the sake of safety in our country we would have little to no privacy. Based on how much the internet, text messages, and other monitorable services are used in daily life. People shouldn’t be so quick to give up their privacy rights in the name of national security. Some people will undeniably argue that giving up a few privacy rights is a small cost for making sure our country is safe from most threats. In his essay, â€Å"Invisible Man: EthicsRead MoreGovernment Surveillance : A Controversial Issue On Terrorism853 Words   |  4 Pagesthe Patriot Act, new NSA programs, and a new found â€Å"war on terrorism.† This has become a controversial issue on whether these programs violate Americans’ civil rights. Future government surveillance can be predicted to only become bigger and stronger, unless citizens seek to change the laws that allow the interception of privacy. Although the Fourth Amendment gives citizens the right to privacy, the interpretation of the law leaves the NSA to ultimately invade peoples’ privacy. The Fourth AmendmentRead MoreThe Nsa And The Terrorist Attacks Against Paris1336 Words   |  6 PagesParis, many American political leaders are urging to increase security measures used to fight terrorism. The question is perpetual, Is government spying necessary to curtail terrorist acts? History The NSA was created on November 4, 1952, by President Harry Truman and was held responsible for collecting, processing, and distributing intelligence information from foreign electronic signals. The NSA contributed to the Nation s work in breaking German and Japanese codes during WWII. The informationRead MoreSurveillance Program Unethical Use Of Computer1628 Words   |  7 PagesPrograms created by US Government to invade people s privacy It is primary mission that governments protect its people, and this protection includes using some software programs to monitor suspicious activities that could be caught on the web or from telecom communications. However, would this act invade people s privacy? Would these programs restrict the people freedom? Is this program unethical use of computer? There has been a case similar to that situation when the US government used nationalRead MoreGovernment Surveillance Should Not Be A Better Medium Between Liberty And Security1093 Words   |  5 Pagesfought game of Tug-of-War. Considering the profusion of various opinions and ideas on the subject of government surveillance there will never be a solution that will satisfy everyone but there is one that will satisfy the majority. There are many logical rationales on the proper course of action whether it is in favor of the National Security Agency (NSA), against them, or a whole other approach entirely and that is completely necessary in developing a sound solution. The NSA, the focal point of thisRead MoreSurveillance and Spying on the Home Front Since 9/11754 Words   |  3 PagesDepartments office of Legal Councel and he also took part in the legality of the NSA domestic surveillance program. Yoo supports government surveillance. One of Yoos arguments is since that the enemy is a group of people and not a nation, these terrorists can possibly disguise themselves as American citizens. The NSA has to identify where certain communications can reveal certain threats. Al Qaeda is disguising messages and the NSA is trying their best to interpret them and found out the meanings. YooRead MoreDomestic Surveillance During The United States1474 Words   |  6 Pagesprivate information that has identified itself with the United States of America. With new found ways of viewing American citizens personal information the federal government had to learn how not to get caught. American citizens have right to their privacy and with all the new Domestic Surveillance programs many were warrantless. In 2002 Bush signed a presidential order allowing the National Security Agency to monitor without a warrant. This presidential order applied to international telephone callsRead MoreThe Government Should Detain Suspected Terrorists Without Trial1036 Words   |  5 Pagesrealized the tragedy and destruction caused by terrorism. Marwan Abu Ubcida, a terrorist in training, said, â€Å"Yes, I am a terrorist. Write that down: I admit I am a terrorist. [The Koran] says it is the duty of Muslims to bring terror to the enemy, so being a terrorist makes me a good Muslim.†(Friedman) That enemy happens to be anyone against what they believe. One such enemy meaning the US because we are against terrorism. There is no justification for terrori sm and no reason for the government to try to

Management Principles Effective Depending on the Environment

Question: Describe about the Management Principles for Effective Depending on the Environment. Answer: Introduction Managers have important role to play in an organization. Their style of managing is different in different situations which are known as their management styles. Management style is the process in which the workers and the work process are managed and management style differs on the basis of individualities, work process and companies culture (Grimsley, 2016). There are four management styles Autocratic: The manager does not involve its workers in the process of decision making and the whole process depends on the manager. Democratic: Decision is a collective effort and the manager respects everyones opinion. This style takes time but the workers are satisfied to a large extent. Paternalistic: It is also called dictatorial. Whenever a decision is made it is explained to the workers and feedback is received from them. Laissez-faire: The workers are independent and the manager is the organizer for the workers. The workers take the duty for their job and are helped by manager during trouble (Management styles, 2016). Management practice: It is a business plan envisioned to help organizations occupied by contests due to irregular markets and adjustment in accordance with the increasing needs of customers (Goodrich, 2013). Steve Jobs Background He was born in 1955 in California. He was an American entrepreneur, a computer genius and designer. He studied in Reed College in Portland. In 1976 when he was in twenties, he founded his own company called Apple computer company with Wozniak. Apple came into market in 1977. He was the main marketing force behind Apples and was the CEO of Apple inc. (Elton, 2016). Management style and Practice Steve Jobs was a leader who does not conform to what is done generally. His management style was not confined to text books but he developed his self-vision of how things should be carried out, explained workers about this vision and let them work on their own according to their skills and intervene, when required. He needed excellence from his workers and brought workers, stakeholders and consumers to pronounce his vision. He used Laissez-faire style of management (McInerney, 2011). This can be understood from an example in which Steve Jobs asked Corning, an employee to form the gorilla glass for iphone, Corning said that it wasnt possible. Then Jobs said that it can be done in half a year. And surprisingly, Corning did it in less than 6 months (Famous Laissez Faire Leaders, 2016). His practice includes developing of culture of love and respect among managers and workers. He gives workers independence to bring desired changes and believed that time is important and challenging the w orker inspires him to grow. He only hired those workers who were interested in Apple. He promoted a startup type culture inside the company, no matter how big Apple became (Male, 2011). Warren Buffett Background He is regarded as the Oracle of Omaha. He is called as the investment genius. He was born in 1930 in United States. He studied business at University of Pennsylvania and Nebraska. He developed Buffett Partnership Ltd. in 1956 and governed Berkshire Hathaway. His corporation grew at a rapid rate in sectors like media, insurance, energy, food and beverage.He is a person who invests in promoting goodness for others by means of charity. He is one of the richest man in the world (Warren Buffett biography, 2016). Management style and practice Warren Buffett exhibited the laissez faire and democratic management styles. He chooses workers who are qualified, skillful and let them do their job independently. He employs managers who are intelligent and are passionate in becoming a part of business. He always motivates them after failures and makes them learn from their mistakes (Cheah, 2013). He is part of the leadership team of many companies and invest in those companies and then trust his managers to get the results he wants (Gill, 2016). He believed in developing self-respect and confidence in the workers so that they dont make errors. He admires others and gives attention to everyones opinion and communicates modestly so that managers do not easily leave the company and new talent is keen in joining the company. He remains open and honest with the workers (Stallard, 2014). TOMMY LASORDA Background He was born in 1927 in United States. He started his career as a baseball player at the age of 18 and then became coach for the Dodgers. He is the most famous American baseball supervisor and became diplomat for serving as a manager for 20 years in Los Angeles Dodgers. As a manager, his team won two world championships. He was welcomed in Hall of Fame and is still a consultant for Dodgers (Tommy Lasorda Biography, 2016). Management style and practice Tommy Lasorda follows democratic management style and have trust on his players decisions and his decisions. Unlike any manager, he sent a hurt batter to play besides an ace pitcher and won the game which shows the characters of a democratic manager. And also in 1988, his decision to allow Kirk Gibson pinch hit lead to teams victory and one of the most unforgettable part in baseball records (Gill, 2016). He believes that people who struggle to survive performs excellently. He wants the players to know that he is dependent on them. He takes the players out with him and hugged and patted them frequently. He believes in motivating and maintaining an open communication with them. He inspired the new players and brought out the talent hidden in them to finally win the game (Lasorda, 1989). TONY LA RUSSA Background Tony La Russa was born in 1944 in Florida in United States. He started his career in 1963. After a serious injury he played in junior leagues till 1977. In 1979 he worked as a manager for White Sox. In 1995 he guided the Cardinals and worked for his team and guided them to 3 World Series titles, 6 league championships and 12 division titles. In 1913 he was elected to the Hall Of Fame. At present he is working for Arizona Diamondbacks (Hall of Frame, 2016). Management style and practice Tony La Russa management style is such that he concentrates much more on winning the game than any other manager. As a manager he took Cardinal defeats in a strange manner exaggerating his own importance or power, but that was towards a positive approach. He was not a person to be loved as a manager. He can never be seen in a state of peaceful happiness or relaxed (Will, 2013). His management style was autocratic in nature. He never used to tell anyone what he planned. He know each player on personal level and then prepare for the game. Comparison of Management style and practice Each of the management style is different and has different impacts on employees. Tony La Russa uses the autocratic style in which he made plans himself and does not tell his plans to his team and made his players do as per according to his plans. In this management style the players are not independent and their creativity is restricted and do what their manager wants. He lost as many games as he won. As contrast in Democratic style as used by Tommy Lasorda, the opinions from team are also welcomed and the one that is good is followed. It gives the player a thinking as they are also important and brings inspiration within them and they dont feel pressurised. Warren Buffett also uses the democratic style and each worker opinion is welcomed. This style causes business to prosper as happened with him as this style brings lots of creativity in business. In Laissez-faire style as is followed by Steve Jobs, he gives the task and the worker has to decide how to carry out. This can decrease the output and can reduce regulation because of laziness of workers but this does not happens with him as he employed qualified workers who had passion for the company (Crowell, 2016). Discussion of the effectiveness All the management styles differ in their control over their workers and their environment and all are effective when applied in favourable environment. The autocratic leader gives his worker no control. Democratic half control and Laissez-faire full control. According to me democratic management style is the most effective as in this style liberty is given to the workers to express their opinion but half control of them is still in the hands of manager, so possibility of mistakes are rare as seen by the managerial approaches by Lasorda and Buffett(Macbeth, 2016). Lassiez-faire is least effective as in this case full control is in hands of workers. It is only effective when the workers are highly talented and treat the company as their own as in case of Steve Jobs. The Autocratic style is dependent wholly on the leader, if he is mature enough things will work out to be positive as in case of Tony la Rasso. But if he had chosen any other style he would not have lost as many games as he did now Buffett approach towards managing workers is the best as he never becomes harsh on anyone and is lenient on his workers and so people enjoys working with him and also talented people from different companies will want to join him. Another thing is motivation in management practice which show more results than expected as in case of Steve Jobs, Warren Buffett, Tommy Lasorda. Effective and good communication also helps a lot. Conclusion As compared and discussed above all the leadership styles it is concluded that all the leadership styles can be effective depending on the environment of the organization, the role and function of the managers and the settings suitable for the management style. But according to me Democratic is the most suitable for any organization as all people treats themselves as equal and no burden is laid on the workers. List of references Grimsley, S. (2016). Management styles: Definition, theory and types. Accredited Business. Goodrich, R. (2013). What is practice Management? Business News Daily. Elton, J. (2016). Steve Jobs Biography. Encyclopaedia of world biography. Lasorda, T., Dumaine, B. (1989). Business secrets of Tommy Lasorda. FORTUNE magazine. McInerney, S. (2011). Steve Jobs: an unconventional leader. Fairfax media. Macbeth. (2016). Authoritarian, Democratic and Laissez-faire leadership. Enotes. Male, B., Lubin, G. (2011). 8 Management Lessons I Learned Working Under Steve Jobs. Business Insider. Crowell, E. (2016). Leadership Styles and Types: Authoritarian, Laissez-Faire Democratic. Sociology 101. Stallard, M. (2014). Warren Buffetts 3 Practices that Attract and Retain Top Talent. The Wall Street Journal. Management Best Practices 2016, Tutorials point, viewed 2016, https://www.tutorialspoint.com/management_concepts/management_best_practices.htm. Famous Laissez Faire leaders 2016, Advise America, viewed 2016. https://www.adviseamerica.com/famous-laissez-faire-leaders/. Biography.com Editors 2016, Warren Buffett Biography, AE Television Networks, viewed 28 August 2016, https://www.biography.com/people/warren-buffett-9230729#related-video-gallery. Biography.com Editors 2016, Tommy Lasorda Biography, AE Television Networks, viewed 28 August 2016, https://www.biography.com/people/tommy-lasorda-9542214#hall-of-fame. Gill, E 2014, What is Democratic/Participative Leadership? How Collaboration Can Boost Morale. St Thomas University, viewed 25 november 2014, https://online.stu.edu/democratic-participative-leadership/. Cheah, A. (2013). Warren Buffett. [Blog] Posts(atom). Available at: https://agnescheah.blogspot.in/p/blog-page.html [Accessed 25 November 2013]. Will, L. (2013). Overwhelmingly Himself. Sports on Earth. Tony La Russa 2016, National Baseball Hall of Fame. Viewed 2016, https://baseballhall.org/hof/larussa-tony.